NADYAJ, divinatory deception

A pseudo clairvoyant named Nadyaj (Nadyajtarotmedium) is rampant on social networks with impunity. She appears decked out, most of the time, with unfailing confidence, as if despite all her stammering and hesitations, she was the holder of an unshakeable truth. Everything she says is divinatory deception and likely to disturb fragile minds. We understand that she seeks to distinguish herself from others. Like a modern-day witch, she proclaims herself, at the same time, medium, healer, spiritualist… She announces the future, speaks to the deceased but if we look seriously at her interventions, we see that, between two heavy sighs, she slips in a word, an approximation… The goal is to trigger an interaction with her interlocutor who, if he acknowledges a first name from those around him or a scene, will give her the credit she needs to justify her status as a medium.

Many people who have consulted her claim that she has no gifts or skills. They believe that this lady discredits the profession in general and honest practitioners. You just have to listen carefully to one of his speeches and you quickly realize that his words lack content. And, on social networks, it becomes extremely easy to abuse and take advantage of the naivety of people who are suffering or waiting for extraordinary news. Above all, what appears to be truly unacceptable are his morbid and deadly predictions. She acts like a charlatan by trying to fool her subscribers to increase their number. Nadyaj (which is her pseudonym) announces death, serious accidents, makes medical diagnoses… When we know that honest mediums are careful not to address these questions given their repercussions on fragile consultants or not, it is legitimate to ask the question of the merits of their interventions. A medium must take into account the context in which he intervenes. Announcing serious news head-on shows a lack of tact and professionalism. Ethically, questions related to death must be treated in a very specific way. It is above all a question of ethics. Is the consultant able to hear everything? It is for this reason that many practitioners who work in the field of divinatory arts categorically refuse to predict the death of someone or even that of the consultant. It’s about showing psychology and empathy without lying. We can anticipate danger, an imminent event, a brutal and sudden change while being benevolent. Surfing the wave of death, illness, accident and the morbid can actually generate a certain enthusiasm for voyeurism or, conversely, unmanageable anxieties. This can attract crowds, followers are in the front row. A person contacted Inad to express all the anger she had towards this pseudo-psychic who without the slightest care would have announced to one of her friends the death in an accident. This young woman had an accident and died shortly after. The clairvoyant in question sells it and promotes it every week live on social networks. Weis entitled to wonder if it was not his words which put dark thoughts in the young woman’s head? In any case, making the death of an individual a daily advertisement to attract crowds amounts to indecency. In the same way, this clairvoyant Nadyaj felt invested with a mission: to organize and produce lives on the disappearance of the young child Émile, of whom we have no news. Many pseudo-mediums, false investigators, fortune tellers and magnetizers of all stripes have joined his speculations. She frequently talks about disappearances and her “spirit box” brings her information. And beware of those who dare to contradict her! She is adept at occult works. So, threats and malicious spells can flood people she doesn’t like. She creates fake accounts in her name, pretending to have been hacked so as not to have to answer for her actions. She obviously charges for clairvoyance as well as bath ritual products, candles, jewelry, etc. From Luxembourg, she came to live in France, creating a company just after her dramatic live performance on little Émile. She must certainly have been operating in the shadows and illegally. She is described as a narcissistic woman who speaks about herself in the third person. She would have gathered and retained several thousand subscribers thanks to the crazy live broadcast on little Emile. We see that its audience is young. She herself uses sloppy vocabulary punctuated with swear words. This ensures a certain proximity with her interlocutors with whom she can identify and contributes to her show. The actions of this pseudo clairvoyant call for a more in-depth reflection on her practices and on those of certain enlightened people who represent a real danger for malleable and impressionable minds. Marie-Lou