Just as a trap requires bait to be operational, the clairvoyance scammer would be nothing without loyal stooges moving willingly in their shadow.
These “human baits” are most often not even aware that they are there. These people are even convinced that they are acting in their own name when they immoderately praise a particular clairvoyant, or fiercely defend a questionable position. The word “free will” also comes up quite strangely in their comments, as if they had to tirelessly justify their behavior. I will understand the reader’s objection that admiration which commands respect, or any other form of disinterested sympathy towards others is not necessarily synonymous with irrational submission. We can, indeed, admire a person for their ideas or their actions without leaving behind any critical sense or any individualism.
However, during my year of observation on the Wengo forum, I was able to note some deviations which were no longer a simple manifestation of friendship or respect. This was true adoration, misplaced deference, unwavering loyalty on the part of certain consultants towards their clairvoyants. One of these consultants immediately caught my attention: it was a woman with the pseudonym Ushuaia, who had been desperately waiting, for years, for the realization of a sentimental prediction, to the point of being omnipresent on the forum as well as on the psychics’ rating sheets. Love makes you blind, as everyone knows, but never has this saying seemed so true in a person. Each positive feedback given by the speakers of the Wengo forum was greeted with warm vivas from him, because it “made him feel good”, according to him. Each negative feedback, however, was received in a frankly destabilizing manner.
Ushuaia rebuffed the dissatisfied customer through various methods which all encouraged discouragement, in particular by doubting the good faith of the speaker (sometimes suspected of lacking perspective or objectivity, sometimes of not having waited “long enough”, since time would be “elastic” in clairvoyance), or sometimes by adding a perfectly contradictory comment following the negative report (“are you sure? For my part, with so-and-so, it has always been went well, I even have several returns + to give him…?”, “No, you must be wrong, I can’t believe that you were scammed”, “I don’t believe that Wengo has any scammers among its experts, you are surely wrong”). If none of these processes worked, it then moved on to the next phase which consisted of accusing the “disbeliever” of madness, gratuitous malice, a venomous attitude, and other unpleasant adjectives. As I played the role of the vindictive customer, she quickly treated me like this, and even invited me to leave the forum since “I didn’t believe in clairvoyance and therefore had nothing to do there”. Ushuaia is a person all the more dangerous because she is completely unaware of it. The entire Wengo forum, a composite platform which, I remind you, includes good clairvoyants as well as notable crooks (see my last article), was defended body and soul by a client desperate to wait for her predictions to come true, soon followed by a number of Panurge sheep who were dragging the same pans behind them.
This tiny discussion network had taken a sectarian turn by itsmediation: as all worship is in fact based on faith in the infallibility of the guru, it had become necessary there to remove manu militari all the “unbelievers” who presented themselves, and who were likely to divert members from the “right path”.
Aware of the danger she represented for the lucidity of Wengo’s consultants, I pushed Ushuaia to leave the forum, provoking her relentlessly. I thought I had succeeded, but, tired of fighting, and because I had already invested a lot of my time in studying this environment, the opposite happened. Since then, on the forum, we have read Ushuaia speaking in these terms: “Thank you so much for this positive feedback WHICH FEELS GOOD. I too have had several returns + with several wengo mediums, sometimes within the planned dates, but most often late and sometimes several months late. Today I’m a little stuck because nothing is moving forward but I trust many of the mediums I have consulted, and if they were wrong about my story I know that they would have the honesty to recognize it and that they would not let me continue to hope. » What can we understand in this statement when we learn, a few lines below, that 5% of the predictions delivered in Ushuaia have come true, and that 95% are still pending (for years)? What should we think of these numerous presuppositions which immediately establish that Wengo mediums are necessarily honest and honest people? What can we deduce from this story, which, like so many others, aims to be neutral and impartial (according to Ushuaia itself)? And above all… How can we not be afraid for the customer who is still a novice and who such comments could make too confident? And how can you not pity someone like Ushuaia?
Clairvoyance nourishes hope, and hope defends itself as one defends its last ramparts: with the strength of despair and the patience of a Saint. Stone by stone, Ushuaia strove to safeguard its unfinished fortress, made up entirely of shaky predictions. Relentlessly, stubbornly, she let nothing pass, nothing filter. When her own clairvoyances contradicted each other, she took refuge behind improbable pretexts: clairvoyance is an uncertain and changing science, events change as our destiny is written! she claimed. But what is the point of consulting in this case? The paradoxes abounded, but did not frighten him. No matter, this forum had become his battlefield. Each new day was a battle to defend one’s positions. But fighting to preserve chimeras proves potentially dangerous, for her as for those who hope at her side. Will she learn it the hard way?
What could I add other than to caution potential consultants to this platform to only give these people the credit their bias deserves? Beware, yes, beware of the devout clientele. Seemingly harmless, she will extend her hand to help you rush into the wolf’s den. Some may be lucky enough to be turned to experts worthy of the name, but how many does a platform like Wengo have in its ranks? Amélie
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report