We want to muzzle INAD

Following the publication of the article by Bertrand CAILAC, entitled: Wengo: ‘‘Expert in Scam?’’ The counsel of this company has just sent us, on behalf of its client, a formal notice for the purpose of removing, under penalty of legal proceedings, the article in question or making access to it impossible, which, according to it, is of an insulting and defamatory nature. The content of the said article is consistent with the truth and INAD is not in the habit of acting maliciously towards anyone and even less of publishing false information.

We recall that INAD has pursued, for 23 years, a legitimate aim: to warn consumers against the abuses of certain practitioners and other clairvoyance firms. And generally speaking, INAD’s mission is to inform, prevent and support consumers who are victims of fraudulent actions by notorious dealers, professional manipulators and certain enlightened people who have infiltrated this niche of clairvoyance and divinatory arts.

The INAD acts within the framework of laws and regulations and cannot accept any threat, blackmail or pressure to muzzle the information so useful to consumers of the divinatory arts who are too often victims of the indelicate actions of certain people.

It is obvious that the Wengo company can use, if it wishes, its right of reply to give its version of the facts.