In recent years, a profound and worrying change has taken place in the practice of clairvoyance. In-office consultations, once a guarantee of seriousness and intimacy, are gradually being abandoned in favor of telephone sessions where the practitioner often remains anonymous, hidden behind a pseudonym. This development raises serious questions about the ethics and credibility of this practice, as well as the safety of consultants.
In-office consultation: a guarantee of seriousness and effectiveness An in-office consultation provides a setting conducive to a real connection between the clairvoyant and his client. This face-to-face meeting helps establish a climate of trust, essential for addressing often intimate and deep questions. The practitioner, in this cozy setting, devotes all his time and energy to his consultant, far from distractions or interruptions. During a live session, essential elements such as body language, the energy released, and the emotions felt enrich the clairvoyant’s perception. These subtle elements, impossible to capture remotely, make all the difference between a truly inspired consultation and a simple impersonal discussion. Incompetence and irresponsibility: the mask of the pseudonym It is often difficult to trust a practitioner who chooses to hide behind a pseudonym and refuses to provide their professional address. Can you imagine a doctor, a psychologist or a priest practicing like this? These professions, like that of clairvoyance, are based on transparency and mutual trust. Hiding under the pretext of protecting your privacy is an unconvincing argument. This approach rather suggests a desire to hide incompetence or to avoid the responsibilities incumbent on a serious professional. An authentic practitioner has nothing to hide: he works within a clearly defined framework, commits his reputation and is available to his consultants. INAD’s alarming findings The INAD National Institute of Divinatory Arts, draws up a clear observation: the vast majority of practitioners of clairvoyance - enlightened people, charlatans, businessmen without qualms - have no place in this profession. On the contrary, they represent a real danger for often vulnerable clients, looking for answers to cope with the ups and downs of life. Anonymity and lack of professional framework indicate abuse. These self-proclaimed practitioners, often devoid of any real skills, use dubious techniques, such as software generating generic answers or standardized speeches that apply to everyone. An exhausting practice that requires seriousness and limits A gifted and truly inspired clairvoyant or medium knows that clairvoyance is not an assembly line activity. A quality consultation requires a deep connection with the energy of the consultant, which requires considerable mental and emotional effort. Beyond three or four consultations per day, a serious clairvoyant risks exhaustion and loss of precision in his feelings. However, anonymous psychics who carry out dozens of telephone consultations per day cannot offer a sincere and personalized service. This practice, purely commercial, betrays the essenceeven clairvoyance, which should be an intuitive and spiritual art, not a mass service. The ethical dangers of telephone clairvoyance This widespread trend poses major ethical problems: a- Irresponsibility: Anonymity prevents any responsibility. A clairvoyant without a face or address can disappear without assuming the consequences of his actions. b- Abuse of vulnerability: Clients, often in a difficult emotional situation, are more easily manipulated in the face of irresponsible or malicious practitioners. c- Trivialization of the practice: By moving away from office consultations, clairvoyance loses its authenticity and depth, becoming a simple commercial service. In-office consultations For clairvoyance to regain its nobility, it is imperative to return to transparent and responsible practices. Face-to-face in-office consultations guarantee a setting where trust, listening, and intuition can truly be expressed. They also help restore professional ethics and protect consultants. INAD’s findings remind us of the importance of raising public awareness of these abuses. Before consulting, it is essential to find out about the reputation and qualifications of the practitioner. INAD also provides resources to help individuals identify serious professionals and avoid abuse.
Faced with modern excesses, responsibility also falls on consulting clients. By opting for experienced, transparent, clearly identified practitioners who fully assume their identity and engage in a sincere relationship, they contribute to restoring trust in this profession. Clairvoyance, when exercised with integrity, probity, and respect, remains a valuable discipline to support and enlighten those who need it. Thus, to preserve the dignity of this practice, it is essential to reject anonymous offers and to promote a return to authenticity, seriousness, and the true commitment of rigorous practitioners.
Youcef SISSAOUI President of INAD
Share your point of view in a respectful and constructive spirit.