We understand the legitimate questions of some of our members, seeing some names of people responsible for audiotel services, appearing among the members.
We remind you that the INAD does not support the practice of clairvoyance via audiotel services which, in the vast majority, constitute a lucrative deception and are the spoils of business to the detriment of many consumers and rigorous practitioners who are themselves the first victims. The INAD, therefore, did not accept memberships from audiotel service firms but nominative memberships from individuals in an individual capacity who have undertaken on their honor to respect the moral and professional charter proposed to the entire profession.
It is worth remembering that the firms where these practitioners work have perfectly understood the importance and role of INAD, by agreeing to reimburse certain dissatisfied clients.
For information, the contractual agreement between practitioners of the divinatory arts, known as “Independent Professional Practitioners” and audiotels clairvoyance companies, of which we have already informed you in a previous article, is intended, among others, for independent practitioners, which could lead certain leaders of audiotel services not only to give up exploiting qualified professionals, but also to respect them, by remunerating them at their fair value, and also to give up calling on practitioners. inexperienced, ‘enlightened’, dubious or to those who have nothing to do with the divinatory arts.
This can only be a good thing because in any case, our approach has no other goal than to remove injustice from certain reprehensible practices.
To this end, we recall that encouraging and making a vulnerable customer-consumer dependent on regularly calling back a practitioner or audiotel services (premium rate numbers) to provide advice, suggest or offer payment by credit card or any other means of payment for flat-rate or “priority” clairvoyance subscriptions, imaginary occult work, repetitive consultations (very frequent) for illusory predictions under the cover of a Fanciful clairvoyance constitutes in itself fraudulent maneuvers relating to fraud and abuse of weakness referred to and punished by articles 313-1-2 and 223-15-2 et seq. of the Penal Code.
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report