While browsing the INAD website, an article entitled: David Mocq, Word of clairvoyant, caught my attention. As I share the point of view of this professional, I react by expressing my astonishment. I am all the more surprised to note that no one in the world of clairvoyance (whom I do not know), has supported one of their own, the victim of malevolence, of ‘revenge’ orchestrated by a so-called ‘known’ magazine by the only practitioners who appear there, some without their knowledge, according to INAD. Indeed, the two articles that I read, published on the website of this organization, devoted to this subject, clearly denounce, it seems to me, a deception, that is to say people who attribute to themselves powers, qualities that they do not have, deceive others and therefore necessarily harm those who do not share their opinion. This is why consistency with oneself and with others is a guarantee of safety, credibility and professionalism for both professionals and clients.
In matters of defamation, as in everything else, the law is the law, it is unequivocal and the same for everyone. Some people tend to forget or ignore it. But I repeat, these people who want to be above the law are, in my opinion, part of the register of psychopathology. By believing he has every right to harm Mr. MOCQ, whose only mistake was to refuse to endorse a misleading ranking of the ‘best clairvoyants in France’.
I am absolutely against this ‘‘horrible’’ tendency which consists of letting it happen, of remaining silent, of not moving in the face of such slander, such cowardice… There is reason to ask questions. This is indeed the moral and professional responsibility of every practitioner of the divinatory arts, of every citizen loving justice.
In this ‘‘selfish’’ world, it would be good for solidarity to be essential…
I express myself here as a psychologist but also as a person and therefore place myself on the side of the human subject and the person. There is no shortage of victims of jealousy and ignominy - in my “environment where I belong” - and often find no serious, reliable and upright support, apart from the guilt of a shifty glance, a lowered head or the appearance of ignorance. I can only remind you of the duty that falls to each of us to no longer let “this” happen and to react in time, to no longer condone this type of behavior and actions.
By browsing the INAD website, I discovered that this organization actively participates in the fight against charlatanism and fraud and defends clients and professionals in the divinatory arts against these abuses and that the world of clairvoyance is ‘‘infected with the virus’’ of fraud and organized deception and leaves little room for honest practitioners. It seems to me that it is up to them to come together, to reach out to each other to actively fight against the excesses of the majority of their ‘‘sisters and brothers’’. The future of this profession depends essentially on brotherly solidarity, on the union of true professionals, working with honesty, ethics and morality, rid of the bad apples and their charlatanesque practices.
Merryl PAILLARD Consultant psychologist (state qualified in clinical psychology and occupational psychosociology)
Report
Report
In response to Sylvie Virginie Josse
Report
Report
Report
In response to France Terme voyante
Report
Report
Report