Written press

Detractor or septic

To the anonymous Internet user who claims that INAD is useless…your remark is very far from reality. We would like to remind you that for 23 years we have not stopped intervening, in vain, with the public authorities to somewhat regulate the practice of the divinatory arts.

But the absence of control and surveillance is not an obstacle for the INAD which regularly intervenes on behalf of consumers who are victims of the fraudulent actions and questionable practices of certain unscrupulous firms and practitioners. Is it necessary to publish everything? It seems to us not. Because it is this discretion of amicable intervention with the professionals implicated by their former clients which allows us to resolve - often and successfully - the dispute between the interested parties.

Some telephone clairvoyance firms (audiotels) - who believe themselves to be above the law - have even tried to intimidate us so that we abandon support and advice to their victims who have spent tens of thousands of euros for nothing. Having regained their faculties, these victims did not hesitate to file a complaint against these firms and against some of their psychics for complicity in an organized gang.

There is no doubt that INAD is disturbing; the stakes are enormous for telephone clairvoyance manufacturers who no longer hesitate to proclaim themselves experts to give themselves strength and credit to a clientele that is poorly informed but passionate about the divinatory arts and the need to know what the future has in store for them.

For the record, the INAD is at the origin of the first Moral and Professional Charter for practitioners of the divinatory arts, previously submitted to the D.G.C.C.R.F - General Directorate for Competition and Fraud Repression - before being made public and proposed to the entire profession.

In addition, we were encouraged in 2010 by the Ministry of Small & Medium Enterprises, Commerce, Crafts and Liberal Professions to make the Moral Charter known and respected throughout the profession.

A word to the readers

Comments

3 comments
Anonymous

J&#39aimerai savoir s&#39il existe un recours pour un médium / voyant professionnel déclaré et prochainement adhérant à l&#39INAD , qui est porté en diffamation sur des forums publics (internet). La situation dure depuis 6 mois et l&#39identité personnelle du médium (nom / prénom et ville) ont été publié sur le forum Doctissimo
Malgrès des alertes à la modération du site, rien n&#39est fait : pouvons nous intenter quelque chose ?
La virtualité a du bon : l&#39anonymat des détracteurs.

Report
Anonymous

Bonjour je suis voyante professionnelle référencée par l&#39INAD. une personne de présentant comme "bénévole" de l&#39inad contrôle selon elle sous vos ordres sur le forum doctissimo en guerre contre les pseudos voyants/médiums..Bien sûr je n&#39ai rien à redire contre le fait d&#39effectuer ce type de contrôle (j&#39ai échangé avec cette bénévole qui a vérifié mon site, mes infos légales etc..et notre échange s&#39est très bien passé)..Ce que je trouve étrange c&#39est que cette personne s&#39exprime un peu trop vivement sur plusieurs posts de ce forum et parle comme une "ado" je reprends l&#39expression qu&#39elle a utilisé pour se présenter en public en s&#39adressant vivement envers un internaute : "je suis accro à l&#39INAD, tu connais ?" Pleins de petites "pics" de ce genre qui je trouve ne correspond pas à l&#39éthique de l&#39INAD. J&#39aimerais savoir si votre institut pratique vraiment cette méthode de surveillance dont je ne reproche pas le but je le répète mais dont la méthode me semble un peu aggressive...Cordialement..

Report

Your opinion counts

Leave a comment

Your email address will never be displayed.