I have noticed, on a certain number of forums, that malicious people, under the cover of anonymity, write lies and untruths about clairvoyance professionals not only to discredit them but also and above all to smear them…, it’s so simple, so easy to hide behind anonymity!… For the information of consumers, I must point out that I have already been implicated and therefore obliged to pursue those responsible for two blogs which conveyed false information from anonymous Internet users who were none other than malicious and jealous “psychics”. Indeed, by posing as disgruntled consumers, they wanted to discredit me and seriously harm me for reasons more akin to jealousy than anything else. However, I did not even know these individuals, of whom there were 6. Of course, they were sentenced on February 17, 2009 for defamation and €3,500 in damages each by the Paris High Court. I must point out that the conviction of these individuals included the publication of the judgment on the home page of their website. But since I don’t have a twisted or vengeful mind… Which clairvoyant today can claim to be infallible? Me ! I only live in uncertainty because I have never claimed to be infallible. Of course you can’t please everyone… I see that the follow-up of some of my consultants, over all these years, proves to me that if I were as bad as described in these comments, I would have asked myself the question: “why are they coming back?” » I at least have the frankness and honesty to tell each of my consultants not to take my clichés, my visions, my feelings at face value…, a success of 60 or 70% of my predictions or those of a colleague is already a significant performance. I have always given free will to my consultants; I am not here to impose my clairvoyance on them against their will because each of us is the sole master of our own destiny. I deplore the attempt to discredit certain professionals who courageously put the brakes on or who try to do their work honestly. …..
Claude Alexis
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report
Report