REMINDER! However honest he may be, the clairvoyant, the true one, can fail when he undergoes a test seeking to prove his faculties. As divination is not subject to will, it is only the “gift” (immaterial faculty) which differentiates true from false.
How to separate the wheat from the chaff?
It seems that for the understanding and practice of the Divinatory Arts as for the people who consult them, clairvoyance, mediumship, tarology etc. are a conjectural phenomenon and therefore cannot be the subject of any certainty. Consequently, all professionals who claim to give precise dates as to the occurrence of an event can only be lying, and these same professionals could be prosecuted, in certain cases, for the non-fulfillment of the prediction. Since the clairvoyant or the tarot reader is not bound by an obligation of results, the client can demand a reimbursement when a practitioner assures him with certainty that his predictions have come true. The clairvoyant is only there to guide his consultant in his present situation, to support, to give hope in the face of the difficulties that he “perceived” in his vision. This vision will allow him to restore strength and courage to his consultant, increased energy and renewed dynamism to successfully lead his life. We therefore see that the role of the honest and conscientious professional is an eminently social role. And it is because clairvoyance professionals touch on social issues that some of them infiltrate this profitable and poorly protected environment. Multiple businessmen, these merchants trafficking in human distress, operate shamelessly. Very often organized into real industries, they organize telephone networks, in addition to their misleading and noisy advertising, thus trapping elderly people, single women, disturbed men and women prey to a moral misery which makes them cling to any “Master”, “Seer of the century”, “junk magician”, all clever charlatans with extravagant fees. ..
The good clairvoyant is the one whose criteria of seriousness, morality and competence are above all suspicion. First of all, he does not talk about himself to prolong the consultation: He respects the private life of his client and refrains from disclosing it to those around him, even the most intimate. Professional secrecy requires. The good clairvoyant informs his client about his fees, the duration of the consultation and the support used. The good clairvoyant does not give you generalities that flatter your ego and does not extort details from you concerning your private life, details which he will hasten to embellish and which will serve as a framework for his consultation. ..
And the guardian angels?
The good clairvoyant does not boast to his clientele of his privileged conversations with “guardian angels or guides” with whom he is supposed to dialogue at all times. It is the same with the “disappeared” whose bereaved families he claims to console with fabricated spiritualism. This process risks making the consultants dependent on the “practitioner”. The good clairvoyant is the one who reveals to you, without asking you any questions, the purpose of your telephone call. It is the one that reveals past and present events to you, and the current state of your situation in difficulty, which is the subject of your request. The customer comes to look for a light near the indicator; his free will, still intact, will choose the bestway. This is good clairvoyance. Finally, the consultant must know that the “diplomas”, “certificates” and other distinctions “of qualities” with which the clairvoyant could line the walls of his office have no value.
Last warning: The good clairvoyant, provided with a true GIFT, refrains from announcing the death (either of the consultant, or of someone close to him or of a public figure) even if ‘‘his prescience’’ suggests it to him. This announcement could seriously disturb the person concerned himself and his family, there is a danger and an unforgivable professional error, in contradiction with the moral principles which the good clairvoyant must necessarily demonstrate.
Youcef SISSAOUI
Report
Report
In response to janques
Report
In response to ANNIE DE GIVERNY - MEDIUM
Report
In response to ANNIE DE GIVERNY - MEDIUM
Report
In response to janques
Report