Practical advice

Remote clairvoyance and audiotel

We recommend to all consumers that they should never communicate their bank details to an audiotel firm or any other clairvoyance professional by telephone, before having first obtained all the information* on: the conditions, duration and cost of a clairvoyance consultation, the name of the practitioner and the precise address where they practice. Otherwise, you risk being the victim of a scam and finding yourself having to pay a prohibitive sum for dubious clairvoyance, which is only in name. You should also know that behind several audiotel services there are (often) the same people and the same companies who record the information collected on a computer medium.

Furthermore, we expressly remind any independent collaborating practitioner of an “audiotel clairvoyance” firm who is put in direct contact with the consulting client, that his role is an eminently social role and that consequently, he must not be linked directly or indirectly to any abuse or to any scam, his duty is to ensure before starting his consultation that the consumer client has been well informed about the conditions of connection to obtain his consultation.

Furthermore, it is up to him “practitioner” and not his client to end the consultation by informing the latter that the duration of said consultation has come to an end.

If only one of these conditions is not respected, the customer has the right to end the discussion or even request full reimbursement of the sums that have been taken and/or refuse to pay sums beyond what was agreed.

Consumer of the divinatory arts, we advise you to be demanding because it is in your interest at all levels: financial, psychological… by your action and by your rigor you will also contribute to changing mentalities, to making the practitioners themselves responsible and to discouraging the sour finesse specialized in conditioning to impose on you a clairvoyance consultation which is only in name. Only collective awareness would be able to limit or even put an end to the multiple excesses of certain firms and other professionals.

  • consumer information is a legal obligation

A word to the readers

Comments

5 comments
l-inad

Aucune personne n&#39a été désignée par l&#39INAD pour tester un quelconque service audiotel. Nous sommes curieux de connaître son identité.

Report
thomas

dommage que l&#39Inad ne soit pas plus connu. Il y aurait moins de victimes

Report
Anonymous

Sur un serveur audiotel MAELLY il y a une personne qui dit être de l&#39inad et être en cours de test; cela est-il possible?

Report
Anonymous

je cherche donc cette liste de voyants par tél recommandée par votre groupe?

Report
Anonymous

bsr je suis bien d&#39accord avec vous les consommateurs devraient aussi se responsabiliser,afin de décourager ces malversations de ces praticens malhonnetes...mais malheureusement le consommateur le comprend aprés,d&#39ou l&#39interet aussi de responsabliser les voyants qui alimentent ,en faisant semblant de ne pas connaitre ces dérives...biensur celui qui paie est le consommateur

Report

Your opinion counts

Leave a comment

Your email address will never be displayed.